Archive for the ‘Other - Business & Finance’ Category

What’s the legal basis for the government to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009
Erik asked:


What is the specific legal basis for the takeover?

Is this part of a Federal statute? If so, what’s the specific reference? Which section of Federal law governs these two corporations?

Is this part of a contractual legal agreement between the US government and Fannie and Freddie? If so, what agreement? A loan agreement between the government and Fannie / Freddie?

Thanks.
I’ve done a little more investigation and found this: http://www.ofheo.gov/media/PDF/FHFACONSERVQA.pdf

It states “In this instance, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) has been appointed by its Director to be the Conservator of the Company in accordance with the Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-289) and the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4501, et seq., as amended) to keep the Company in a safe and solvent financial condition.”

This apparently provides the answer to the question . Here’s a link to the 2008 act: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-3221.

Here’s a link to the 12 USC 4501: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode12/usc_sec_12_00004501—-000-.html

Based on a quick check (not yet a detailed review), it appears that the 2008 act is the source of the statutory authority for the conservatorship.
Here’s a corrected link for the 2008 act: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-3221

What are the drawbacks to giving a former employee a negative reference?

Friday, February 13th, 2009
Lauren Em asked:


My family owns a small business. I get calls often from potential employers who want references for our former employees. I love to give good references when they’re deserved, but my father insists on NEVER giving a negative reference–even when we know the employee in question was awful. I think he’s afraid of legal repercussions, but as long as you’re telling the truth about the person’s work performance, isn’t it better to be honest?
I’m talking about if they were chronically late, didn’t follow instructions, didn’t have skills they claimed to have on their resumes, etc.–not gigantic accusations like theft or drug use or auto accidents, etc.